Variable costing vs absorption costing essay
Marginal cost and marginal costing
This system does not eliminate completely the incentive to overproduce, but it makes overproduction less profitable to managers. In process costing, products are produced in a continuous process and costs are systematically assigned to the product. It includes past costs that may not be relevant to the prevailing decision making and pricing processes. Both of these costing methods allow you to see the cost of your inventory, in a different way. Variable costing and absorption costing differ from each other in the way that they treat fixed costs. But if the production and the sales are equal than there is no difference between the two reported incomes. This way managers, like Mr. As you can see below the only difference between the two methods is in how the Fixed Manufacturing Overhead MOH is treated. There are many ways to decrease the incentive of overproduction. How to cite this page Choose cite format:. Rosen, who are evaluated on the basis of operating income can temporarily improve profitability by increasing production.
Under absorption costing if inventories increase then some of the fixed manufacturing costs of the current period will not appear on the income statement as part of cost of goods sold.
Also, what is than done when actual factory overhead does not equal applied factory overhead? Marginal costing and absorption costing are the basic two methods of costing that are used for managerial decision making. He could plan on selling more units.
But given the reasons stated above variable costing is still the way to keep the books for the decision makers. How to cite this page Choose cite format:. Module 1 Case Absorption vs.
Difference between marginal costing and variable costing
Marginal costing is an invaluable management accounting technique that is used to provide managerial information about profit and volume relationship and costs incurred in the business. Besides the problems with absorption costing listed above, it considers fixed manufacturing overhead as product cost which shows a higher cost per unit than variable costing. Reconcile reported income under absorption and variable costing. Marginal costing or variable costing considers direct materials, direct labor and variable manufacturing overhead costs as product costs. Marginal costing avoids apportionments that are made on arbitrary basis It is more suitable for managerial decision-making and controlling processes. As for absorption costing, fixed manufacturing costs are included as part of product costs. Direct costs are directly attributed to the cost units. The first one charges inventory holding costs against profits. Absorption costing method avoids separation of total costs in to fixed and variable elements, as these are not easily identifiable Davies and Pain, , p. Absorption costing technique is considered as having more accuracy because a particular share of the production costs are apportioned against future sales It is also more suitable for job costing and batch costing because it is helpful or taking decisions of pricing and therefore there is accuracy that profit markup is enough to meet fixed costs Cost Accounting System, , p. The absorption costing considers fixed factory overhead and hence value of inventory will be relatively higher than that in absorption costing Jawahar-Lal, , p. In marginal costing, inventories are valued in the basis of variable production costs and hence the stock value is comparatively in a lower level. Illustration Using above provided cost information the relevant calculations under marginal costing method are presented below. This is never more evident than in this case study. This factor decreases the efficiency of stock-based compensation to eliminate or reduce overproduction incentive.
Marginal costing is more suitable, reliable and accurate with internal financial reporting, where as absorption costing is most appropriate for external financial reporting and analysis. The forth method consists of the implementation of just-in-time production systems.
Thus, SUD08 Company might apply this costing method because it is simple to understand and no charge fixed overhead to total cost of production.
based on 2 review